Brenda Michelson had this to say on Twitter yesterday…
..and all I had was a smartass response. Brenda shared a valuable idea.
Somehow “lead architects” rubbed me the wrong way…so let’s get rid off it:
All architecture is design… —Grady Booch
…we can just speak of “lead designers” who need to know all the questions…or at least many…or know folks who know questions.
Let’s also include “lead developers” and lead whatevers in that description and use this broad definition of designer:
Everyone designs who devises courses of action aimed at changing existing situations into preferred ones. –Herbert Simon
With that out of the way, why do we need lead designers when we’re all subscribing to collaborative design? What does leading design mean in the context of collaborative design?
What if we considered a lead designer to be an expert who then should be considered a knowledge manager as described by Andy Grove in High Output Management? From this perspective, leading (managing) is then much less about making (design) decisions than about gathering & distributing information and influencing decisions (nudging).
Leading design would then become facilitating and supporting collaborative design, i.e. helping the group design and designing with the group. Leading would then become helping the group figure out whom to follow with respect to different issues. Leading would then mean ensuring that all voice have a chance of being heard, especially the quieter ones.
Leading design then wouldn’t rub me the wrong way.